FreeInstead

Guide

Free photo organizer software: what actually replaced Picasa

Google retired Picasa in 2016, and people still search for its download every day. Windows' own Photos app has since dropped face grouping and tag search too. The free replacement is digiKam — face recognition, tags, duplicates and a map, all running on your own computer. But the more useful lesson from Picasa is about where your tags are stored, because that decides whether the hours you spend organising survive the next app you switch to.

Short answer

Use digiKam, and on day one tell it to write tags into your files. It is the only free, open-source organiser that does face recognition, tags, ratings, duplicate finding and map view entirely on your own PC. If you shoot RAW, look at darktable instead — it organises and edits.

Best overall
digiKam — faces, tags, duplicates, map; GPL, offline
Just browse by date
Windows Photos — already installed, but lost faces and tags
You shoot RAW
darktable — a library and a RAW editor in one
Clean up duplicates first
Czkawka — finds duplicate and similar photos fast
Don't install
Picasa — retired in 2016, unpatched, only on download portals
HOW MOST APPS STORE IT HOW IT SHOULD BE STORED Tags in the app's database one hidden file only it reads Tags written into the files IPTC / XMP, or .xmp sidecars The app is discontinued or you simply switch programs The app is discontinued or you simply switch programs your tags your tags Tags and face names lost the Picasa experience Any program reads them your organising survives
Every organiser stores your tags, ratings and face names somewhere. If they live only in the app's database, they die with the app — which is what Picasa users found out. Written into the files, any program can read them.

Why the tool matters less than where it keeps your tags

Most “best photo organizer” lists are written by companies selling one, and they rank their own product first. Two of the top results for this search right now are exactly that. The rest are forum threads where people describe the same problem: they organised thousands of photos in something, the something went away, and the organising went with it.

Picasa is the famous case. Google retired it in 2016, and people still search for its download every day — not because it was the best software, but because their albums and face names live in it. Windows users got a smaller version of the same thing: the new Photos app no longer groups photos by face or searches by tag, according to Microsoft's own support page. If you tagged people in the old one, that work stayed behind.

The fix is a storage decision, not a brand. Photo files have standard places for metadata — IPTC and XMP — that every serious photo program can read. An organiser that writes your tags, ratings, captions and face names into those fields (or into a small .xmp file next to each photo) leaves your work portable. One that keeps them only in its own database leaves you locked in, whether it is paid or free.

digiKam can do the portable version, and it is the main reason it is the pick here. It also does the thing people actually wanted from Picasa — finding everyone in 40,000 photos — with face recognition that runs locally. On first launch it offers to download its recognition models; after that, its documentation is explicit that no data is shared over the internet and no cloud service is used. Your family's faces are not being uploaded to be sorted.

The one setting to change on day one: in Settings → Configure digiKam → Metadata, make sure tags, ratings, captions and face tags are ticked under “Write This Information to the Metadata”. For RAW files, choose to write to XMP sidecars — digiKam won't write into RAW files by default, and that is the safe choice. Then whatever you do next year, your organising comes with you.

And back the library up. An organised collection on one drive is still one drive. Our free backup guide covers the part that matters more than any organiser.

The free organisers worth installing

Four tools, for four different situations. Three are open source; one is already on your PC. Everything below runs on your own computer, with no account and no upload.

digiKam

Best overall

Best for: large libraries, face recognition, tagging, finding duplicates

A full photo manager from the KDE project, developed for over twenty years. Point it at your existing folders and it builds a catalogue without moving anything: albums, tags, star ratings, colour labels, captions, a timeline, a map of geotagged shots, and a Find Duplicates tool that compares image fingerprints rather than file names.

Face recognition and auto-tagging (it can label “beach”, “dog”, “car” for you) run on local models — downloaded once, then entirely offline. It handles JPEG, HEIC, RAW and video. The honest downsides: the interface is dense, the Windows installer is about 260 MB, and the first face scan of a big library takes hours. Let it run overnight.

Download digiKam → GPL-2.0 · v9.1.0

Windows Photos

Already installed

Best for: browsing by date and folder, when you don't need tags or faces

If all you want is to scroll your photos by date and do quick edits, you already have it. It's fast and it's fine.

Know what it no longer does: the current version organises by folders rather than albums, and it dropped the People tab and tag search that the old version had. Microsoft still offers Photos Legacy in the Store for people who relied on those, but that is a holding pattern, not a plan. Microsoft has also started rolling out a separate OneDrive Photos app with optional face grouping; it is new, arrives with OneDrive, and we'd wait before building a library around it.

Download Windows Photos → Included with Windows · free

darktable

If you shoot RAW

Best for: photographers who want the library and the RAW editor in one

If your camera shoots RAW, you probably want an organiser and a developer in one program — which is what Lightroom is, and what darktable is for free. Its library does ratings, colour labels, tags and collections, and it writes them to XMP sidecars by design.

It has no face recognition, so for a family archive digiKam is the better fit. For a photographer's working library it is the stronger choice. The full case, with setup, is on our free Lightroom alternative page; if you're weighing it against RawTherapee, see darktable vs RawTherapee.

Download darktable → GPL-3.0 · v5.6.1

Czkawka

Clean up first

Best for: finding duplicate and near-identical photos before you organise

Not an organiser — a cleaner. Years of phone backups, re-imported cards and “copy of copy” folders usually mean thousands of duplicates. Czkawka finds exact duplicates and visually similar images (resized, re-compressed, burst shots) very quickly, and lets you review before deleting anything.

Run it once before you start tagging, so you aren't naming the same face three times. digiKam has its own duplicate finder, but Czkawka is faster on a messy drive and needs no catalogue. Download it from the GitHub releases page; for Windows, the Krokiet build is the newer interface.

Download Czkawka → MIT · v12.0.2

Before you install anything

Photo libraries are where people keep the files they can least afford to lose, which makes the catches here more expensive than in most categories:

  • Don't download Picasa. Google retired it in 2016, so every “Picasa download” you find now comes from a third-party portal, not Google — exactly where installers get adware bundled in — and the program itself has had no security updates for a decade. If your old face tags are in Picasa, digiKam can read the tags Picasa wrote into files; point it at the same folders.
  • “Free” cloud storage has a ceiling. Google Photos stopped offering unlimited free storage in June 2021. Today it shares 15 GB with Gmail and Drive, which a phone fills in a year or two — after that, it's a subscription. Cloud photo services are genuinely convenient; they are not free organisers.
  • Freeware isn't always free for you. XnView MP is an excellent fast viewer with tagging, but it is free only for private and educational use — a small business needs a licence. Adobe Bridge is free but needs an Adobe account. Neither is open source, so neither can promise the next version stays free.
  • The “AI photo organizers” that rank for this search are mostly paid. The vendors at the top of the results sell their own apps. digiKam's face recognition and auto-tagging do the same core job locally, for nothing.
  • Self-hosted options are servers, not apps. Immich and PhotoPrism are excellent Google Photos replacements — if you run a home server or NAS that stays on. On a laptop that sleeps, they're the wrong tool. digiKam is the desktop equivalent.

Organise in something that writes to your files, keep two copies, and no app shutting down can take your organising with it.

What each one actually does

The last row is the one to weigh hardest — it decides whether your organising outlives the software.

digiKamWindows PhotosdarktablePicasa (retired)
Face recognitionYesLocal models, offlineNoRemoved in the new appNoPartlyUnmaintained since 2016
Tags, ratings & albumsYesPartlyFolders, no tag searchYesRatings, labels, tagsYes
Find duplicatesYesImage fingerprintsNoNoPartlyExact copies only
Map of geotagged photosYesNoYesPartlyUnsupported since 2016
RAW filesYesViews and cataloguesPartlyViews someYesFull RAW editorPartlyOld cameras only
Writes tags into your filesYesIPTC/XMP or sidecarsNoYesXMP sidecarsPartlyPartly, mostly its own files

Questions people actually ask

What is the best free photo organizer for Windows?

digiKam, for most people with more than a few thousand photos. It is free and open source, it organises by albums, tags, ratings, dates, places and faces, and all of it runs on your own computer.

If you only browse by date, the Photos app that comes with Windows is enough. If you shoot RAW and want to edit too, darktable combines a library with a RAW editor.

Is there a free photo organizer with face recognition?

Yes — digiKam. It detects faces, lets you name a few, then suggests the same person across the rest of your library.

The recognition runs locally: digiKam downloads its models once on first launch, and its documentation states that its AI features work only on your computer with no data shared over the internet. Expect the first scan of a large library to take hours; a graphics card with OpenCL support speeds it up.

Can I still download Picasa?

Not from Google. Picasa was retired in 2016, so any download you find now comes from a third-party site, and the software has had no security updates in a decade. Download portals are also where installers most often get adware bundled in.

If you want Picasa back because your albums and face tags are in it, install digiKam and point it at the same photo folders. Tags that Picasa wrote into the files come across; anything that lived only in Picasa's own database may not.

Is digiKam any good? (digiKam review)

Yes, with one honest caveat. It is the most complete free photo manager available — faces, tags, duplicates, maps, batch renaming, RAW support — and it has been developed continuously for over twenty years, with version 9.1.0 released in June 2026.

The caveat is the interface. It shows a lot of panels and options at once, and the first hour feels busy. Most people only need the album and tag views plus the People view; the rest can wait.

Is digiKam safe and really free?

Yes. It is licensed under the GPL, published by the KDE community, with no ads, no account, no paid tier and no watermark. Download it only from digikam.org or download.kde.org.

It does not move or rename your photos unless you ask it to. It reads them where they are and keeps its catalogue in a separate database file.

Does Windows 11 Photos still recognise faces?

Not the current Photos app. Microsoft's support page confirms that the People tab and face grouping are not in the new version, and neither is search by tags. The older Photos Legacy app, still in the Microsoft Store, keeps them.

Microsoft has begun rolling out a separate OneDrive Photos app with optional face grouping. It's new, so we'd wait before relying on it for a whole library.